Catherine McNeilly's Letter To Pittsburgh CitizensPOSTED: 1:24 pm EDT April 12,
2007 The following is a letter to the public written by Pittsburgh Police Cmdr. Catherine McNeilly that was obtained by WTAE Channel 4 Action News. McNeilly is paying for the letter to run in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette sometime next week. (Click here to read the entire story behind the letter.) To The Citizens of the City of Pittsburgh:I have been asked if I am “happy” with the terms of the settlement in the suit that was filed against the City of Pittsburgh, Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and Chief Nate Harper for my actions that were taken in good faith and in the public interest, according to the law.The situation deteriorated because of undue influence by an individual or individuals who, because they were unelected, were unaccountable to the public. What began this whole series of events was an attempt in the legitimate and routine performance of my duties as a Zone Commander to initiate disciplinary action against an officer who was abusing sick time and secondary employment privileges to the detriment of his fellow officers, but more importantly ~ to the public safety.The irony of this entire charade is that not only does that officer remain undisciplined to this day, but he is enjoying the salary, benefits and elite status of “acting detective.” He is presently assigned to the unprecedented and untouchable “Office of the Assistant Chief of Operations,” and is still enjoying the privilege of working secondary employment.In essence, his actions have been rewarded rather than reprimanded, and they continue.Another intimately involved individual remains in an influential and sensitive position within the Mayor's Office, making her privy now, as she has been throughout, to all aspects of this situation.Because this has been allowed to continue, and absolutely no effort has ever been made to move her from the sensitivity of the Mayor’s Office throughout this ordeal, I was, and remain convinced that this administration genuinely believes there has never been any wrongdoing emanating from that office, regardless of what has been said in Federal Court.I would be greatly disappointed if State Attorney General Tom Corbett (in charge of the Public Corruption Unit) or U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan chose to ignore the findings of the Federal Court when it was emphatically noted that my case was about “wrongdoing and improper and undue influence by the Mayor’s Office in the Police Department matters,” and not about corruption in my police department, especially in light of the fact that so much remains unchanged to this day.I can only hope that our Criminal Justice System has duly noted the Federal Court’s findings, and I have faith and confidence that the system will take up the task of realizing, undertaking and completing what the Temporary Injunction Hearing was not intended to accomplish.I would like to express my admiration of the Honorable Judge Donnetta Ambrose for the meticulous and diligent attention that was paid to every detail presented in the grueling testimony during this hearing, and for the professional and expeditious manner in which a ruling was brought forth.I do not intend to become enriched personally as a result of this redress of justice.
|











