Homepage > Entertainment

'Extreme' Porn Couple Guilty In Pittsburgh Obscenity Case

Owners Plead In Federal Court After Nearly 6 Years

POSTED: 10:23 am EDT March 11, 2009
UPDATED: 5:57 pm EDT March 11, 2009

The owners of a California company that distributes pornographic videos depicting simulated rape and murder has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute obscene materials.

Zicari
Robert "Rob Black" Zicari

Robert Zicari, 35, of Northridge, Calif., pleaded guilty Wednesday in Pittsburgh federal court on behalf of Extreme Associates Inc. His wife, Janet Romano, 32, also pleaded guilty.

"Ultimately, you'll get to see the real 'Rob Black' (Zicari's character name) when we come back for sentencing. Rob's a very sweet man," said his attorney, H. Louis Sirkin.

Zicari and Romano declined to comment.

Prosecutors charged them in 2003 with distributing videos through the mail and images over the Internet to western Pennsylvania.

U.S. District Judge Gary Lancaster dismissed the charges in January 2005, finding that the prosecutors improperly applied obscenity statutes. The charges were later reinstated by an appeals court.

Romano
Janet "Lizzie Borden" Romano

Lancaster accepted Wednesday's pleas from Zicari and Romano and scheduled their sentencing for July 1. The maximum penalty is five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Sirkin will ask for a sentence of 10 to 16 months, half of which could be served in a halfway house. The government is pushing for 27 to 33 months.

The couple decided to plead guilty because prosecutors agreed not to calculate how much they earned from the porn business, which could have affected their potential sentence, Sirkin said.



Obscenity Test

Federal prosecutors used the U.S. Supreme Court's Miller v. California ruling from 1973 to argue their case against Extreme Associates in Pittsburgh.

The ruling says that materials are obscene if they pass a three-part test:

  • The average person, applying contemporary community standards (not national standards, as some prior tests required), must find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.

  • The work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state law.

  • The work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.


    Links We Like

    The first step in reducing debt is recognizing how much you have. Let us help you with the rest and get out from under your debt in 12 months. More

    Get car insurance quotes from all the major carriers and save time an money in the process. Just enter your zip code and start saving today. More

    Does your phone have bad reception or drop calls in your house? Then you need a Magic Jack. More

    A degree from ITT Technical Institute can help you achieve your goals and get you started on the path towards a rewarding career. More

    Caregiving

    Sponsored Links